domingo, 8 de diciembre de 2013

Preventing Chronic Disease | Views of City, County, and State Policy Makers About Childhood Obesity in New York State, 2010–2011 - CDC

open here please ► full-text:
Preventing Chronic Disease | Views of City, County, and State Policy Makers About Childhood Obesity in New York State, 2010–2011 - CDC


Preventing Chronic Disease Logo

Views of City, County, and State Policy Makers About Childhood Obesity in New York State, 2010–2011

Rebecca Robbins, BS; Jeff Niederdeppe, PhD; Helen Lundell, MS; Jamie Meyerson, BS

Suggested citation for this article: Robbins R, Niederdeppe J, Lundell H, Meyerson J. Views of City, County, and State Policy Makers About Childhood Obesity in New York State, 2010–2011. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:130164. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130164External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
No single solution exists to reduce rates of childhood obesity in the United States, but public policy action is essential. A greater understanding of policy maker views on childhood obesity would provide insight into ways that public health advocates can overcome barriers to propose, enact, and implement obesity prevention policies.
Methods
We conducted 48 in-depth, qualitative interviews with town/city, county, and state policy makers in the state of New York from December 14, 2010, through June 10, 2011. We used a semistructured interview protocol to solicit policy maker views on the causes of, solutions to, and responsibility for addressing the issue of childhood obesity.
Results
Most policy makers considered the issue of childhood obesity to be of high importance. Respondents cited changes to family structures as a major cause of childhood obesity, followed by changes in the external environment and among children themselves. Respondents offered varied solutions for childhood obesity, with the most common type of solution being outside of the respondent’s sphere of policy influence. Policy makers cited the need for joint responsibility among parents, government, schools, and the food industry to address childhood obesity.
Conclusion
Beliefs of many policy makers about childhood obesity are similar to those of the general public. Findings highlight the need for future research to inform the development of communication strategies to promote policy action among those with authority to pass and implement it.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Jeff Niederdeppe, PhD, Department of Communication, Cornell University, 328 Kennedy Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-4203. Telephone: 607-255-9706. E-mail: jdn56@cornell.edu.
Author Affiliations: Rebecca Robbins, Jamie Meyerson, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York; Helen Lundell, The Hartman Group, Inc, Seattle, Washington.

References

  1. Brownell KD, Horgen KB. Food fight: the inside story of the food industry, America’s obesity crisis, and what we can do about it. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2004.
  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003–2006. JAMA 2008;299(20):2401–5. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Frieden TR, Dietz W, Collins J. Reducing childhood obesity through policy change: acting now to prevent obesity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(3):357–63. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Kersh R, Stroup DF, Taylor WC. Childhood obesity: a framework for policy approaches and ethical considerations. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(5):A93. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Brescoll VL, Kersh R, Brownell KD. Assessing the feasibility and impact of federal childhood obesity policies. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2008;615(1):178–94. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Eyler AA, Nguyen L, Kong J, Yan Y, Brownson R. Patterns and predictors of enactment of state childhood obesity: legislation in the United States: 2006–2009. Am J Public Health 2012;102(12):2294–302. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Dodson EA, Fleming C, Boehmer TK, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA, Brownson RC. Preventing childhood obesity through state policy: qualitative assessment of enablers and barriers. J Public Health Policy 2009;30 Suppl 1:S161–76.
  8. Moise N, Cifuentes E, Orozco E, Willett W. Limiting the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico’s obesogenic environment: a qualitative policy review and stakeholder analysis. J Public Health Policy 2011;32(4):458–75. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Hersey J, Lynch C, Williams-Piehota P, Rooks A, Hamre R, Chappelle EF, et al. The association between funding for statewide programs and enactment of obesity legislation. J Nutr Educ Behav 2010;42(1):51–6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Gilbert DT, Malone PS. The correspondence bias. Psychol Bull 1995;117(1):21. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Fritz H. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons; 1958.
  12. Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M. Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Q 2009;87(1):7–47. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Niederdeppe J, Shapiro MA, Porticella N. Attributions of responsibility for obesity: narrative communication reduces reactive counter arguing among liberals. Hum Commun Res 2011;37(3):295–323. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  14. Economos CD, Hyatt RR, Goldberg JP, Must A, Naumova EN, Collins JJ, et al. A community intervention reduces BMI z-score in children: shape up Somerville first year results. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15(5):1325–36. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Khan LK, Sobush K, Keener D, Goodman K, Lowry A, Kakietek J, et al. Recommended community strategies and measurements to prevent obesity in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2009;58(RR-7):1–26. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Nuño R, Coleman K, Bengoa R, Sauto R. Integrated care for chronic conditions: the contribution of the ICCC Framework. Health Policy 2012;105(1):55–64. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Institute of Medicine. Bridging the evidence gap in obesity prevention: a framework to inform decision making. Conference proceeding from the National Academy of Sciences. Washington (DC); 2012.
  18. Rajotte BR, Ross CL, Ekechi CO, Cadet VN. Scoping the field of public health law, policy, and research: health in all policies: addressing the legal and policy foundations of health impact assessment. J Law Med Ethics 2011;39(Suppl 1):27–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Boehmer TK, Luke DA, Haire-Joshu DL, Bates HS, Brownson RC. Preventing childhood obesity through state policy. Am J Prev Med 2008;34(4):333–40. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Harris JL, Graff SK. Protecting children from harmful food marketing: options for local government to make a difference. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(5):A92. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Sharma LL, Teret SP, Brownell KD. The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Am J Public Health 2010;100(2):240–6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  22. Niederdeppe J, Robert S, Kindig D. Qualitative research about attributions, narratives and support for policy, 2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(2): http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2011/mar/10_0067.htm. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: