jueves, 7 de agosto de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | The Geography of Diabetes by Census Tract in a Large Sample of Insured Adults in King County, Washington, 2005–2006 - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | The Geography of Diabetes by Census Tract in a Large Sample of Insured Adults in King County, Washington, 2005–2006 - CDC



Preventing Chronic Disease Logo



The Geography of Diabetes by Census Tract in a Large Sample of Insured Adults in King County, Washington, 2005–2006

Adam Drewnowski, PhD; Colin D. Rehm, PhD, MPH; Anne V. Moudon, Dr es Sc; David Arterburn, MD, MPH

Suggested citation for this article: Drewnowski A, Rehm CD, Moudon AV, Arterburn D. The Geography of Diabetes by Census Tract in a Large Sample of Insured Adults in King County, Washington, 2005–2006. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:140135. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140135External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Identifying areas of high diabetes prevalence can have an impact on public health prevention and intervention programs. Local health practitioners and public health agencies lack small-area data on obesity and diabetes.
Methods
Clinical data from the Group Health Cooperative health care system were used to estimate diabetes prevalence among 59,767 adults by census tract. Area-based measures of socioeconomic status and the Modified Retail Food Environment Index were obtained at the census-tract level in King County, Washington. Spatial analyses and regression models were used to assess the relationship between census tract–level diabetes and area-based socioeconomic status and food environment variables. The mediating effect of obesity on the geographic distribution of diabetes was also examined.
Results
In this population of insured adults, diabetes was concentrated in south and southeast King County, with smoothed diabetes prevalence ranging from 6.9% to 21.2%. In spatial regression models, home value and college education were more strongly associated with diabetes than was household income. For each 50% increase in median home value, diabetes prevalence was 1.2 percentage points lower. The Modified Retail Food Environment Index was not related to diabetes at the census-tract level. The observed associations between area-based socioeconomic status and diabetes were largely mediated by obesity (home value, 58%; education, 47%).
Conclusion
The observed geographic disparities in diabetes among insured adults by census tract point to the importance of area socioeconomic status. Small-area studies can help health professionals design community-based programs for diabetes prevention and control.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the National Institutes of Health, grant nos. P20 RR020774-03, R01 DK076608-04, and R21 DK020774.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Adam Drewnowski, PhD, Box 353410, Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915. Telephone: 206-543-8016. E-mail: adamdrew@uw.edu.
Author Affiliations: Colin D. Rehm, Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Anne V. Moudon, College of Built Environments, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; David Arterburn, Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

References

  1. Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A. Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40(3):804–18. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Barker LE, Kirtland KA, Gregg EW, Geiss LS, Thompson TJ. Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.: a diabetes belt. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(4):434–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Cadwell BL, Thompson TJ, Boyle JP, Barker LE. Bayesian small area estimates of diabetes prevalence by U.S. county, 2005. J Data Science 2010;8:173–88.
  4. Tierney EF, Burrows NR, Barker LE, Beckles GL, Boyle JP, Cadwell BL, et al. Small area variation in diabetes prevalence in Puerto Rico. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2013;33(6):398–406. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated county-level prevalence of diabetes and obesity — United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58(45):1259–63. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific incidence of diabetes among adults — participating states, 1995–1997 and 2005–2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57(43):1169–73. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Giles WH, Galuska DA, Serdula MK. Geographic variation in the prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related behaviors. Obes Res 2005;13(1):118–22. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Congdon P, Lloyd P. Estimating small area diabetes in the U.S. using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Data Science 2010;8:235–51.
  9. Tompkins JW, Luginaah IN, Booth GL, Harris SB. The geography of diabetes in London, Canada: the need for local level policy for prevention and management. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7(5):2407–22. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Congdon P. A multilevel model for cardiovascular disease prevalence in the US and its application to micro area prevalence estimates. Int J Health Geogr 2009;8:6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Zhang X, Onufrak S, Holt JB, Croft JB. A multilevel approach to estimating small area childhood obesity prevalence at the census block-group level. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:E68.
  12. The International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32(7):1327–34. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse. Diabetes overview. http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/overview/. Accessed November 30, 2013.
  14. Marshall RJ. Mapping disease and mortality rates using empirical Bayes estimators. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 1991;40(2):283–94. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Census tract level state maps of the Modified Retail Food Environment Index (mRFEI). http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/resources/reports.html. Accessed June 20, 2013.
  16. Fischer MM, Scholten HJ, Unwin D. Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS. Bristol (PA): Taylor & Francis; 1996.
  17. Getis A, Ord JK. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 1992;24(3):189–206. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods 2010;15(4):309–34. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai I. Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw 2013;10(2):1–34.
  20. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Statistics. http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics/. Accessed November 30, 2013.
  21. Slack T, Myers CA, Martin CK, Heymsfield SB. The geographic concentration of US adult obesity prevalence and associated social, economic, and environmental factors. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014;22(3):868–74. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  22. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. County health rankings & roadmaps. http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/washington/2013/rankings/outcomes/overall/by-rank. Accessed November 15, 2013.
  23. Curtis AB, Kothari C, Paul R, Connors E. Using GIS and secondary data to target diabetes-related public health efforts. Public Health Rep 2013;128(3):212–20. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  24. Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev 1988;10:164–90. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  25. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289(1):76–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  26. Moudon AV, Cook AJ, Ulmer J, Hurvitz PM, Drewnowski A. A neighborhood —wealth metric for use in health studies. Am J Prev Med 2011;41(1):88–97. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  27. Rehm CD, Moudon AV, Hurvitz PM, Drewnowski A. Residential property values are associated with obesity among women in King County, WA, USA. Soc Sci Med 2012;75(3):491–5. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  28. Rehm CD. Obesity in our community: trends, distribution, consequences, disparities and the response. Snohomish Health District; 2009. http://www.snohd.org/Shd_HS/HealthData.aspx. Accessed February 20, 2014.
  29. Di ZH, Yang Y, Liu X. The importance of housing to the accumulation of household net wealth. http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/jchs.harvard.edu/files/w03-5_di.pdf Accessed February 15, 2013.
  30. Sloan KL, Sales AE, Liu CF, Fishman P, Nichol P, Suzuki NT, et al. Construction and characteristics of the RxRisk-V: a VA-adapted pharmacy-based case-mix instrument. Med Care 2003;41(6):761–74. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: