lunes, 10 de noviembre de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Using the Community Readiness Model to Examine the Built and Social Environment: A Case Study of the High Point Neighborhood, Seattle, Washington, 2000–2010 - CDC

FULL-TEXT ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Using the Community Readiness Model to Examine the Built and Social Environment: A Case Study of the High Point Neighborhood, Seattle, Washington, 2000–2010 - CDC



Preventing Chronic Disease Logo



Image of eCard



Using the Community Readiness Model to Examine the Built and Social Environment: A Case Study of the High Point Neighborhood, Seattle, Washington, 2000–2010

Joyce Buckner-Brown, PhD, MHS, RRT; Denise Tung Sharify, BA; Bonita Blake; Tom Phillips, BS; Kathleen Whitten, PhD

Suggested citation for this article: Buckner-Brown J, Sharify DT, Blake B, Phillips T, Whitten K. Using the Community Readiness Model to Examine the Built and Social Environment: A Case Study of the High Point Neighborhood, Seattle, Washington, 2000–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:140235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140235External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Background
Residents of many cities lack affordable, quality housing. Economically disadvantaged neighborhoods often have high rates of poverty and crime, few institutions that enhance the quality of its residents’ lives, and unsafe environments for walking and other physical activity. Deteriorating housing contributes to asthma-related illness. We describe the redevelopment of High Point, a West Seattle neighborhood, to improve its built environment, increase neighborhood physical activity, and reduce indoor asthma triggers.
Community Context
High Point is one of Seattle’s most demographically diverse neighborhoods. Prior to redevelopment, it had a distressed infrastructure, rising crime rates, and indoor environments that increased asthma-related illness in children and adolescents. High Point residents and partners developed and implemented a comprehensive redevelopment plan to create a sustainable built environment to increase outdoor physical activity and improve indoor environments.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the High Point redevelopment, organized by the different stages of change in the Community Readiness Model. We also examined the multisector partnerships among government and community groups that contributed to the success of the High Point project.
Outcome
Overall quality of life for residents improved as a result of neighborhood redevelopment. Physical activity increased, residents reported fewer days of poor physical or mental health, and social connectedness between neighbors grew. Asthma-friendly homes significantly decreased asthma-related illness among children and adolescents.
Interpretation
Providing affordable, quality housing to low-income families improved individual and neighborhood quality of life. Efforts to create social change and improve the health outcomes for entire populations are more effective when multiple organizations work together to improve neighborhood health.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank members of the High Point community, the High Point Community Council, and the Seattle Housing Authority for their collaboration and contributions to this article. This work could not have been possible without their partnership and support. Authors received no financial support for this article. Opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.

Author Information

Corresponding author: Joyce Buckner-Brown, Health Scientist, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop K81, Atlanta, GA. Telephone: 770-488-5427. E-mail: jbucknerbrown@cdc.gov.
Author Affiliations: Denise Tung Sharify, Neighborhood House Community Health Program, Seattle, Washington; Bonita Blake, High Point Community Council, Seattle, Washington; Tom Phillips, Developer, High Point Community, Seattle Washington; Kathleen Whitten, ICF International, Atlanta, Georgia.

References

  1. Hood E. How poor housing leads to poor health. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113(5):A310–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Acevedo-Garcia D, Osypuk TL, Werbel RE, Meara ER, Cutler DM, Berkman LF. Does housing mobility policy improve health? http://www.nchh.org/Portals/0/Contents/Article0668.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2014.
  3. Kramer MR, Hogue CR. Is segregation bad for your health? Epidemiol Rev 2009;31(1):178–94. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Osypuk TL, Acevedo-Garcia D. Beyond individual neighborhoods: a geography of opportunity perspective for understanding racial/ethnic health disparities. Health Place 2010;16(6):1113–23. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Dunn JR. Housing and health inequalities: review and prospects for research. Housing Stud 2000;15(3):341–66. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Acevedo-Garcia D, Lochner KA, Osypuk TL, Subramanian SV. Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach. Am J Public Health 2003;93(2):215–21. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Jacobs DE, Brown MJ, Baeder A, Sucosky MS, Margolis S, Hershovitz J, et al. A systematic review of housing interventions and health: introduction, methods, and summary findings. J Public Health Manag Pract 2010;16(5):S5–10. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote healthy homes. Washington (DC): Office of the Surgeon General; 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44192/pdf/TOC.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2014.
  9. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2008. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/. Accessed June 18, 2013.
  10. Kleit RG, Allison J. HOPE VI for High Point: baseline report. Seattle (WA): Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington. https://www.ksamedia.osu.edu/sites/default/files/originals/Kleit-9.pdf.
  11. Edwards RW, Jumper-Thurman P, Plested BA, Oetting ER, Swanson L. Community readiness: research to practice. J Community Psychol 2000;28(3):291–307. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  12. Plested BA, Edwards RW, Jumper-Thurman P. Community readiness: a handbook for successful change; 2006. Fort Collins (CO): Tri-Ethnic Center for Prevention Research.
  13. Krieger J, Rabkin J, Sharify D, Song L. High Point walking for health: creating built and social environments to support walking in a public housing community. Am J Public Health 2009;99(Suppl 3):S593–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  14. Takaro TK, Krieger J, Song L, Sharify D, Beaudet N. The Breathe-Easy Home: the impact of asthma-friendly home construction on clinical outcomes and trigger exposure. Am J Public Health 2011;101(1):55–62. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2001;14(2):182–97.file:///C:A%20Documents%20Temp%20C%20driveBuckner-Brown%2014_0235%20PubMedCrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Carter JS. Reassessing the effect of urbanism and regionalism: a comparison of different indicators of racial tolerance. Sociation Today 2005; 3(3). http://www.ncsociology.org/sociationtoday/v32/urbanism.htm. Accessed September 23, 2014.
  17. Mumford KG, Contant CK, Weissman J, Wolf J, Glanz K. Changes in physical activity and travel behaviors in residents of a mixed-use development. Am J Prev Med 2011;41(5):504–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Farr Associates. An expert review on the strength of the public health data in support of proposed community design standards in LEED for neighborhood development; 2008. http://www.farrside.com/media/CDC-LEED-ND_Report2.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2014.
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guide to community preventive services. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. http://www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/index.html. Accessed November 18, 2013.
  20. National Prevention Council. National prevention strategy. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2011. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/strategy/report.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2014.
  21. Seattle Housing Authority. Redevelopment plan. http://www.seattlehousing.org/redevelopment/high-point/plan/. Accessed September 14, 2014.

No hay comentarios: