domingo, 10 de abril de 2016

Surgical patient safety outcomes in critical access hospitals: how do they compare? | AHRQ Patient Safety Network

Surgical patient safety outcomes in critical access hospitals: how do they compare? | AHRQ Patient Safety Network

After adjustment, no difference in surgical patient safety measures between small rural hospitals and same size nonrural ones.
J Rural Health. 2016 Feb 16; [Epub ahead of print].



PSNet email header

  • Study
  •  
  • Published February 2016

Surgical patient safety outcomes in critical access hospitals: how do they compare?

    Critical access hospitals are located in rural areas, at least 35 miles from any other hospital. Prior studies found these hospitals may have worse outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia, compared with other acute care hospitals. Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and American Hospital Association, this study examined surgical outcomes from 136 nonfederal general hospitals with fewer than 50 beds. Following adjustments for patient mix, hospital characteristics, and number of discharges, investigators found no differences in surgical patient safety indicatorsbetween critical access rural hospitals and comparably sized prospective payment hospitals. This finding demonstrates the importance of quality surgical care in rural hospitals. An AHRQ-funded toolkit provides resources for small rural hospitals interested in implementing safety measures.














    View More

    No hay comentarios: