GESTIÓN EN SALUD PÚBLICA: BioEdge: Landmark UK decision broadens scope of surrogacy

sábado, 28 de mayo de 2016

BioEdge: Landmark UK decision broadens scope of surrogacy

Landmark UK decision broadens scope of surrogacy

by Michael Cook | 28 May 2016 |

In a landmark decision, the High Court in the UK has ruled that it is discriminatory to prevent single men or women from becoming the parents of babies born to surrogate mothers. The government will probably have to update its legislation to make it compatible with the ruling.

Until now, only couples in a stable relationship could become parents of a child born to a surrogate mother. Single people could adopt children, but they were not automatically entitled to be regarded as a parent if their child was born to a surrogate.

In this case an unnamed man used his sperm, a donor egg and a surrogate mother in Minnesota to create a child, who is called “Z” in court documents. But when he brought the baby back to the UK, he was not regarded as a parent, but rather the surrogate mother. (Ironically, in the US, the surrogate mother has no legal status.) So Z was made a ward of the court, with custody awarded to his father, a situation which will now change.

The solicitor for Z’s father, Natalie Gamble, commented: “The UK has a proud tradition of taking a progressive approach to assisted reproduction and non-traditional families, and the current surrogacy laws are a glaring anomaly which fail to uphold our most fundamental values of safeguarding children's welfare.”

The government did not contest Z’s father’s case and admitted to the court that the law had breached human rights legislation, was discriminatory against single parents and needed to be changed.

The decision was severely criticised by people who interpreted it as an attack on the traditional family. A Labour MP and former Minister Frank Field told The Mail on Sunday: “In all these decisions, the natural rights of children get overlooked. Parenting is a huge job and it’s about time that children are put centre stage, not selfish adults.”

Family policy analyst Jill Kirby commented: “This judgment undermines the traditional family and the child’s needs – the evidence shows that children will thrive much better with two parents caring for them. The Government seems to have abandoned the idea of promoting stronger families.”

- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/landmark-uk-decision-broadens-scope-of-surrogacy/11896#sthash.wlGL6Xf3.dpuf

We want to send a big thank-you to everyone who contributed to BioEdge over the past four weeks. Our goal for annual donations this year was US$15,000 – and we received just about half of this during May. We’re more or less on target.

This is very encouraging for our work in reporting on significant developments in bioethics around the world.

We know that we can do better. Occasionally there are glitches and omissions. We always appreciate your suggestions and, sometimes, your admonishments!

This year we hope use social media more effectively to draw readers to the site. But the best way of attracting new subscribers is by word of mouth. Please encourage your friends and colleagues to sign up!

If you meant to give a donation, but it slipped your mind, there’s still time before the end of the month. Here’s the link:
http://www.bioedge.org/supportbioedge

Thanks again.

Michael Cook
Editor