domingo, 15 de octubre de 2017

BioEdge: Gene of the week: divorce

BioEdge: Gene of the week: divorce

Bioedge

Gene of the week: divorce
     
Divorce does seem to run in families. Children whose parents were divorced have a higher risk of divorcing than those from stable families. The standard explanation is that the children absorbed attitudes towards marital commitment which normalised divorce for them.

So couples with rocky relationships are counselled to strengthen commitment and development weak interpersonal skills.

But all this could be a waste of time. Researchers from Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) and Lund University in Sweden believe that there is a genetic component to divorce. In a study published in the journal Psychological Science, they claim that while biological children were more prone to divorce if their parents were divorce, this was not the case with adopted children.

"I see this as a quite significant finding. Nearly all the prior literature emphasized that divorce was transmitted across generations psychologically," Kenneth S. Kendler, of VCU, says. "Our results contradict that, suggesting that genetic factors are more important."

By recognizing the role that genetics plays in the intergenerational transmission of divorce, therapists may be able to better identify more appropriate targets when helping distressed couples.

"Previous studies haven't adequately controlled for or examined something else in addition to the environment that divorcing parents transmit to their children: genes," says lead author Jessica Salvatore, of VCU. "And our study is, at present, the largest to do this. And what we find is strong, consistent evidence that genetic factors account for the intergenerational transmission of divorce. For this reason, focusing on increasing commitment or strengthening interpersonal skills may not be a particularly good use of time for a therapist working with a distressed couple."


Bioedge

Bioedge

Saturday, October 14, 2017 

During his campaign, President Trump promised pro-life voters that he would support their agenda. And he has delivered. He reinstated the Mexico City policy; he has cut funding to Planned Parenthood; he has rolledl back Obamacare's birth control mandate. And now a new strategic plan for the Department of Health and Human Services has definitely taken a pro-life turn, with references to protecting life from conception to natural death. "We are on track to seeing the most pro-life president this country has ever seen," says Tony Perkins, of the Family Research Council.

Not everyone is happy about this. “This is a license to discriminate,” Susan Berke Fogel, director of reproductive health at the National Health Law Program, told Politico. “All of that language brings back all of these things that we’ve seen in the past that are just incongruous with really protecting health care and really improving people’s lives.”

What do you think?

 
Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
 Comment on BioedgeFind Us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Oct 14, 2017
A new strategic plan defends life from conception to natural death
 
 
by Michael Cook | Oct 14, 2017
Even if bioethicist object, patients complain that they are not treated with dignity. So it must mean something 
 
 
by Michael Cook | Oct 14, 2017
There are at least two different schools of thought: consensus commissions and non-consensus commissions
 
 
by Michael Cook | Oct 14, 2017
Scientists are facing whole new set of ethical issues 
 
 
by Michael Cook | Oct 14, 2017
If divorce is genetic, counselling has to change
 
 
by Xavier Symons | Oct 14, 2017
A new study claims that 91% of Quebec caregivers agree with MAiD for the demented. 
 
 
by Xavier Symons | Oct 14, 2017
A 40-year-old Michigan anti-vaxxer has been sentenced to seven days jail.


BioEdge
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios: